Корзина
- Корзина пуста.
Итого:
0,00 ₽
Within this research, site almost every other articles you have realize, whenever appropriatepare the fresh strategy, efficiency and you will contribution with content in the similar topics or having a similar means. Instance, in case the article grows a separate build, compare they which have Bandyopadyhah’s framework criteria (and the other way around — anyone who do Bandyopadyhah’s article you’ll take to their criteria with the buildings of another indication). Include one articles you mention from the bibliography and make use of bibliographic indicators in the text message.
Grading: four points up to 20 products overall (twelve facts and 8 circumstances more credit) — each item: higher — 5 ok — 2; terrible — step 1 High : talked about deeply and you will linked the article in detail on synthesized habits and you may frameworks. Ok : the new synthesized info is just discussed typically
Note: People guess this category is equivalent to “General Criticism”. That isn’t. General Criticism is yet another group from this, and you can follows below.
Just what has evolved as the article is composed? Just how do it is lessons, ideas and you may concepts nevertheless use? From what the total amount has its things come fixed?
Simultaneously, you may also optionally put your additional data in a special subsection. (Do not recite the new author’s analysis regarding the report — you could potentially overview that it as part of the results point.)
Contained in this area you really need to condition your ideas of how good (or poorly) the newest writers performed the browse and exhibited the analysis contributes to the article. Their critique can incorporate both negative and positive comments.